Buddha dating controversy

Rated 4.64/5 based on 540 customer reviews

Some religious groups believe that he is a beneficent deity and an emanation of either Manjushri or Avalokiteshvara.Others believe him to be a harmful and dangerous ghost that should no longer have a place in the Buddhist pantheon.The Nazi swastika was adopted as the symbol of the Nazi Party in 1920 under Adolf Hitler.Now it serves as a stark reminder of the Holocaust that cost the lives of roughly six million Jews over the next two decades.Refuge field paintings have also come to represent sectarian identification, with paintings from different schools selectively depicting only their specific lineage teachers, unique meditational deities, and special protector deities. After surveying over 67 Gelug refuge field paintings on Himalayan Art Resources primarily dating from the 18th and 19th centuries, I found that not one of those paintings depicts the figure of Dorje Shugden.

buddha dating controversy-9

buddha dating controversy-60

buddha dating controversy-5

buddha dating controversy-61

The figure seated atop a lion, on the other hand, is standard for the Gelug tradition, and likely dates to the mid- to late 19th century.

Many of the subjects depicted in Himalayan and Tibetan-style art have controversial elements, but few can generate the heated emotions and fear conjured by the mere mention of the name Dorje Shugden.

Despite this, artistic depictions of the deity have rarely if ever been talked about or studied.

The incident is only one of a number of cases of swastika-themed graffiti in the area over the past few years, including the defacing of a Jewish statue outside Olympia’s Temple Beth Hatfiloh.

There are differences between the Nazi symbol and the Buddhist symbol: the manji turns clockwise, the Nazi swastika turns counterclockwise.

Leave a Reply